Page 2 of 2
					
				Re: Impractical, uncomfortable, and unsightly
				Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2018 9:59 pm
				by FiveFingerMnemonic
				Sheamus Moore wrote:809250CB-8FDB-405B-AC2D-47E02E879671.jpeg
Garments: The other fire insurance (as long as you don’t violate any of the rules and regulations for wearing them, of course).
 
Love this obscure artwork reference.
 
			
					
				Re: Impractical, uncomfortable, and unsightly
				Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2018 9:36 pm
				by Bremguy
				I quit wearing my garments a long time ago.  I have MS (multiple sclerosis) and heat bothers me.  Here in Washington St.  we are having, for us , a heat wave of sorts.  Many days a bit over 90, a couple of weeks over 80.  I cannot wear them, no matter what.  I do wear the tops when I make it to church, sort of a Sunday thing.  About the only time I do wear them is when it is extremely cold.  Otherwise, they just occupy space in a drawer.  
In all reality, the idea of garments are idiotic.   I just wont give the Church that much power over me.
			 
			
					
				Re: Impractical, uncomfortable, and unsightly
				Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:01 am
				by Archimedes
				The church missed a huge opportunity in the 50's when they decided not to use the new asbestos/cotton blend for the jesus jammies.  Heat resistant AND fire retardant.  Or maybe just retarded...
			 
			
					
				Re: Impractical, uncomfortable, and unsightly
				Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:19 am
				by Archimedes
				
			 
			
					
				Re: Impractical, uncomfortable, and unsightly
				Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:26 am
				by Hermey
				slavereeno wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 3:48 pm
Also, I wondered if this guy understood what parts of the body these things are touching, how reverent am I supposed to be with the stuff directly touching my stinky bits 24/7?
 
Every ass-crack is sacred.