Page 1 of 1
The Suit and Russell M. Nelson
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:33 am
by moksha
Does Russell M. Nelson put on a business suit to become President of the Church, or does the President of the Church put on a business suit to become Russell M. Nelson? To what extent does the business suit enhance his powers and abilities?
Re: The Suit and Russell M. Nelson
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:42 am
by Red Ryder
Are we talking about the Mr. Mac suit or the Sex Prevention suit underneath the Mr. Mac suit?
Re: The Suit and Russell M. Nelson
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2018 10:36 am
by MoPag
Or are you talking about this suit?

- IronProphet!.png (129.69 KiB) Viewed 5458 times
Re: The Suit and Russell M. Nelson
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:58 am
by dogbite
It's the articles of incorporation that declare a corporation sole whose succession is to the senior apostle.
It's about the law, not the revelation. Thus we have 15 Prophets seers and revelators, but only one president of the church, that title coming from the articles of incorporation in November 1923. But the succession is clarified in 1940 amendments.
https://mormondisclosures.blogspot.com/ ... chive.html
Re: The Suit and Russell M. Nelson
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2018 5:25 pm
by Reuben
moksha wrote: ↑Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:33 am
Does Russell M. Nelson put on a business suit to become President of the Church, or does the President of the Church put on a business suit to become Russell M. Nelson? To what extent does the business suit enhance his powers and abilities?
It's easy to get confused about this. The suit itself is the president of the church. It wears Russell M. Nelson.
It calls itself Mantle. Without a human symbiote, it doesn't have a heart.
Re: The Suit and Russell M. Nelson
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2018 6:21 pm
by Corsair
Reuben wrote: ↑Thu Jul 12, 2018 5:25 pm
It calls itself Mantle. Without a human symbiote, it doesn't have a heart.
This explains a lot about the modern LDS church. We can all think of policy moves that reflect an empty suit. At some point in the past, this Mantle became stronger than the guy wearing the suit.
Re: The Suit and Russell M. Nelson
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 10:18 am
by deacon blues
I think we need to get back to prophets with beards. Brigham Young through George Albert Smith were some cool looking dudes.
Re: The Suit and Russell M. Nelson
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 6:05 am
by Hagoth
Corsair wrote: ↑Thu Jul 12, 2018 6:21 pm
Reuben wrote: ↑Thu Jul 12, 2018 5:25 pm
It calls itself Mantle. Without a human symbiote, it doesn't have a heart.
This explains a lot about the modern LDS church. We can all think of policy moves that reflect an empty suit. At some point in the past, this Mantle became stronger than the guy wearing the suit.
When Ezra Taft Benson became too feeble to move his his own limbs without the aid of puppetry-for-the-Lord the suit seized the opportunity and began to develop its own powers of mobility. Today it rules from the mall to the ends of the Florida wilderness.
Here is an illustration from the
Ensign showing the suit's perception of its effect on the average member:

Re: The Suit and Russell M. Nelson
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:36 pm
by mylittlefactory